Their main argument is that Cebu Pacific are loosing traffic and potential customers by using cebupacificair.com instead of cebupacific.com

Their first argument is that the phrase ‘Cebu Pacific’ gets 5 times as many searches in Google as ‘Cebu Pacific Air’. This is correct, based on Google Trends, however it’s a completely irrelevant point since cebupacificair.com ranks first for ‘cebupacific’, ‘cebu pacific’ and ‘cebu pacific air’, so they’re certainly not loosing any search engine traffic based on their choice of domain name.

Their next argument is based on the assumption that 15% of visitors out there would be type-in traffic, meaning that the visitors are simply typing what they believe to be the correct domain into the address bar of their browser. While I agree there might be a reasonable level of NEW users who type ‘cebupacific.com’ into their browsers address bar, I would wonder if it’s really as high as 15% and I’d argue that they’re not loosing those visitors. People aren’t going to visit the wrong domain and then just give up on it, they’ll go to a search engine like Google and search for the correct address.

For many Filipinos, Cebu Pacific is the only airline they’ll ever fly due to the competitive pricing and brand awareness. I really don’t believe that visitors who land on the wrong website would simply give up and look elsewhere, especially considering the lack of choices.

And the annoying thing about the whole case review? They talk as though Cebu Pacific purposely left Cebupacific.com and Cebupacific.ph when in fact they were simply too slow to register them before professional domainers. What I’m actually amazed at is that Cebu Pacific haven’t gone through the proper processes to claim these domains which are quite clearly using their trademark.

Blogsvertise was one of the first ever commercial link buying/selling networks. It’s been around for quite some time and has a huge number of publishers(bloggers) and clients(link buyers).

If you’re looking to quickly buy some links at an extremely low price and aren’t concerned about quality or risk then Blogsvertise is for you. Generally, due to the quality of the links obtained, you’ll only find smaller clients with modest budgets using Blogsvertise for their link development needs.

As a publisher, you’re not going to make much money by joining blogsvertise(average 9-15 USD per post) but if you’re stuck for topics to write about and want to earn some beer money on the side then you might consider giving it a go.

Style of paid links

Publishers who’ve had their blog approved for the blogsvertise network will be assigned tasks based on the theme and Google Pagerank of their blog. Publishers will be provided with a topic which they must write about and the anchor text and URLs for links they must include within the post. Generally the minimum requirements are 2-3 paragraphs of unique relevant(to the links) text and a minimum of 3 links to the client.

What are the pros of this style for publishers/bloggers?

You have complete control over the content you place on your site. You’ll be writing the content yourself and do not need to place any misleading or promotional text. If the links you need to include were for pet insurance then you could write a generic post about pets and then include the links naturally without misleading your readers into thinking you’re actually promoting that company.

What are the pros of this style for clients/link buyers?

The blogsvertise network is full of publishers who operate blogs covering just about every topic imaginable. This means you can buy links from highly relevant sites. Another benefit is that you do not need to provide any content yourself. The blog owner will write the content and you will make the decision to approve or decline the post. Cheap links with little effort.

What are the cons of this style for clients/link buyers?

The biggest problem with using the Blogsvertise network for your link development is that generally the blogs you’ll be buying your links on will be filled with existing posts stuffed with links. Because of this, not only will the links have relatively little effect on your sites positions in Google but you also risk a penalty due to the obvious nature of your link buying.

Google have historically penalised websites which buy links through well known networks like Blogsvertise, ReviewMe and Text-Link-Ads. If you want to make a quick buck with sites you can afford to have dropped from the search engines then go for it but for any respectable client website, avoid blogsvertise!

Their link development operations run under different trading names such as Direct link ads and Adbeans. Obviously, such a large SEO company wouldn’t want to be openly associated with buying links for the purpose of passing page rank and influencing a clients position in the search engines.

Style of paid links

For standard websites, DTM provide PHP code which you need to insert into your sites existing template which will create an adblock (similar in style to Google Adsense). The content of the adblock rotates as per their clients requirements so you have no control over what will appear or which sites you’ll link to. You can however control how many links you want to include.

What are the pros of this style for publishers/webmasters?

The pro of this approach is that it’s very easy for webmasters to integrate the adverts into their existing websites.

What are the pros of this style for clients/link buyers?

Since DTMs code is already installed on so many websites, you can get some nice juicy links coming in very quickly.

What are the cons of this style for clients/link buyers?

You have no control over the placement or style that the webmaster applies to the adverts. He may place them in the footer, sidebar, in a ‘paid links’ section or may attempt to make the links semi-invisible with CSS styling.

Aside from the fact that this style of adblock screams ‘paid links’, the biggest con is that if (or when, since this has happened before) the DTM ad server develops a fault, every website running their code suddenly displays the same error which makes it very easy for Google and competitors to out the network and clients.

Another con is that the same content is often used on multiple websites. So again, it’s a big footprint which lets competitors and Google track the network.

Casino.de are pushing hard to rank for casino terms in Google(DE) and are doing well – averaging around 5th-6th place for most casino related terms. Although it comes at a premium and a risk. The SEO company they’re using for link development, VectorTrap, are buying indiscriminately of quality (although taking care of relevancy) and paying a real premium for links.

What are VectorTrap doing right?

They’re buying on sites which are relevant to the terms they’re trying to rank for and the site they’re linking to, specifically casino and gambling related sites.

They’re having the links placed contextually which is far more natural than having them dumped in the sidebar or footer.

What are VectorTrap doing wrong?

They’re buying on sites which are already FULL of sold links. This immediately draws attention to their link building practices.

All the links they’re buying are on home pages. They’re not mixing it up by buying on internal pages.

If purchasing on a site/page that’s already stuffed full of links (especially with the same anchor texts) then they should at least make some attempt at having their link put above others.

They’re paying a premium for low quality links! From $450 – $900 per link, per 6 month period. Okay the chances are the webmaster will forget and won’t remove the links after the 6 months, but still, take a look at what they’re buying and tell me it’s worth that much.

The following terms are what they’re looking to rank for (inc. corresponding urls)

Some sample purchases:

BlogDive.com only have one requirement… do not disclose that you were paid to place the link! Obviously, buying or selling links which pass Google PageRank is frowned upon by Google so this is a logical request.

The following terms are what they’re looking to rank for (inc. corresponding urls)

InsuranceNow.org have very few requirements. Your page or blog post must be written in English and you must include a minimum of 3 links to them (using different anchor texts). They’re mostly placing brand links with keywords tacked onto the end.

The following terms are what they’re looking to rank for (inc. corresponding urls)

Asgardsss.co.uk do not require any specific PR or inlink minimum requirements for applicants. However, they do specify that you must write a minimum of 100 words and include at least two anchor texts of terms they’re trying to rank for. They also specify that your blog or site must be home or bike related.

The following terms are what they’re looking to rank for (inc. corresponding urls)

Although UnsecuredLoanServices.com do not specify minimum PR requirements for their link purchases, they do make a number of SEO related requests:

• You must add their link to your homepage(temporarily) as well as an internal page(permanently).
• You cannot add a disclosure within the post itself that it is a paid placement since they do not want Google to know they’re buying links. A sitewide disclosure policy is okay though.
• When placing images which link to their website, you must add alt text which includes the keywords they’re looking to rank for.

The following terms are what they’re looking to rank for (inc. corresponding urls)

HerbalLife are looking to buy links on high PR sites which have a good level of incoming links. Ideally they want to buy on blogs/sites which are related to health, sports, games and fashion. They’re promoting their whole range of sites, English and non-English and focussing primarily on brand terms right now.

The following terms are what they’re looking to rank for (inc. corresponding urls)

Link buying is the process of paying webmasters for the placement of a link or multiple links on their website. This action is done to influence the search results of Google and other search engines.

If for example you wanted to rank for ‘digital camera’, you’d buy links from different websites with the anchor text ‘digital camera’. The higher the PR and the more incoming links going into those sites you buy from and their relevancy to you, the more it will influence your position in the search engines.

Googles view on buying links

You’ve probably landed on this page because your SEO company is suggesting they buy links for you. Firstly, face facts – if you wish to rank for a competitive term then you must be prepared to buy some links. Your competitors are already buying them, that’s a fact.

Google openly talk about a sites ranking being partly based on incoming links from other websites. They don’t go so far as to say that links will ultimately make or break your ranking, but it’s a start.

Although your competitors are buying links, that doesn’t mean it’s safe to jump in at the deep end without some knowledge first! Your site could be penalised – It could be kicked out of the search engine completely or more likely just plummet in it’s position.

Although Google say it’s against their webmaster guidelines to buy links intended to manipulate pagerank, to get involved in excessive reciprocal linking or buying links that plainly pass pagerank, there are few cases of Google penalising a company for buying links direct from other webmasters. This is the safest method of buying links, manually and direct. Even if reported to Google, they’re unlikely to get involved since it’s hard to determine if you’re buying links for SEO purposes or for regular click-through advertising.

There are, however, daily cases of sites being penalised for buying into link networks and other automated link schemes – These are the kinds of link buying schemes you want to avoid. If your SEO company offers to place links on a network of sites operated by them, you should refuse the offer immediately! Likewise, If your SEO company tells you they have webmasters signed up, running their ‘systems’ link code, be cautious. Most likely the placement will be terribly unnatural (footers, side bars etc) and will likely result in a lot of links with the same text around them. These kind of link schemes are easily picked up by Google (automatically) and will result in a penalty within 2-3 months if not sooner.

Different types of link buying

Firstly, link buying is all about the text links. A banner image isn’t going to do anything to get you up in the search engine result pages (serps). Sure you can buy banners with the title text of your desired keywords but they’ll never provide anywhere near the same boost in the serps as a nice basic text link.

Below we’ll explore some of the most common paid link schemes out there today.

Low grade - Blog commenting, forum posting, guestbook comments, social media etc.
These links won’t give you much of a boost in the serps. But they’re free if you do it yourself and pretty cheap if you get someone else to do it. While they won’t give you much of a boost, they will do a great job of fixing that crazily high ratio of money keywords links you’ve bought. Google’s systems are smart, they’ll realise that when 950 of those 1000 links coming into your site all have the anchor text ‘pet insurance’, ‘buy pet insurance’ and ‘online pet insurance’, something isn’t right. So you mix in a few blog comments, social media pages and such like to fix your ratio and avoid automatic detection and potential penalties.

Medium grade - Automated networks
Open commercial link networks such as text-link-ads, reviewme, blogsvertise and TNX. These link schemes are open to all link buyers and sellers. Webmasters wanting to sell links will sign up and have their website assessed by the operators of the link network. If approved, they’ll be given a piece of code to place on their website (usually in a side bar or footer) which will automatically show text links for anyone willing to pay. As a buyer, you’ll usually have a choice over the websites your link is placed on or at a minimum, the theme of the site. These kind of networks are nearly always discovered and penalised. Due to their open nature, it’s never a question of ‘will this network get penalised?’ but rather ‘when will this network get penalised?’. If you’ve got a throw-away site and looking for a quick boost for a month or two before you get booted out of the serps then this method is fine. If you’re looking for long term results and working on an important site then stay clear of these kind of networks.

Medium to High grade - SEO company link networks
Most major SEO companies have their own private link network. Usually they’ll set up multiple blogs and standard websites which interlink to boost each others PR and incoming link count. Along with the interlinking, they’ll buy some high PR links and get junior SEO specialists to perform low grade link link development like those discussed above.The sites in these networks can be of a reasonable quality, with professional content writers adding content regularly. Before letting your SEO company add you into their network, ask them to let you review a few of the sites in the network. Look at the following things:

• How many text links have already been placed on the sites? If there’s a lot, especially if they represent widely different industries then be cautious.
• How many sites are in the network, are they all interlinked? Check their backlinks and see if there’s any obvious connection between the sites. If you can spot one, so can a Google bot.
• Are the sites hosted on different IP addresses (especially different C-classes)? If not, steer clear.
• Will your link be placed contextually (e.g within a paragraph) or placed in a sidebar, footer or separate ad box. For the sake of looking natural, you’ll want a contextual placement.
• Check the rankings of other clients they’ve placed on those sites. Are they doing okay? Are there any reports of their site being penalised in the recent past?

Private automated networks
These networks are similar to the ones ran by text-link-ads or blogvertise. Except rather than webmasters signing up to sell links, your SEO company would have approached different webmasters directly and offered them a monthly fee in return for running their link network code on their websites. This kind of network is preferred to one ran by your SEO company since the sites running your text links will generally not have any connection to each other, will be spread over a wide range of IP classes and have a larger spread of incoming links. There are however two downsides of this type of network. Firstly, highlighted perfectly by the case of Direct Traffic Media(DTM), if the main system serving the adverts encounters an error, such as a PHP code error, the same error shows up on any site running their network code. This makes it very easy for people to quickly scrape a full list of sites running the DTM network.  The second problem is that due to the automated nature of this type of link network, you’ll most likely end up with a poorly placed link. Instead of having a contextual link blended into the content, you’ll get a side bar, ad box or footer link.

High grade - Although this is the most time consuming method, it’s the safest and will produce the best links… The method? Manually contacting webmasters who operate websites with a theme similar to your own. For example, if you’re selling pet insurance, there are thousands of blog and site owners out there you can buy links from. Few SEO companies have the resources and skills required to carry out this kind of link development and many companies want to take the short cut with automated link networks. It’s risk and patience vs. reward.